<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8216;Cool&#8217; is A Powerful Marketing and Social Force</title>
	<atom:link href="http://agroovyweb.com/2010/07/27/cool-is-a-powerful-marketing-and-social-force/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://agroovyweb.com/2010/07/27/cool-is-a-powerful-marketing-and-social-force/</link>
	<description>Social Conversations: The Art of Listening, Marketing 2.0 and Newish Technology &#38; Media</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2012 12:01:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Isman Tanuri</title>
		<link>http://agroovyweb.com/2010/07/27/cool-is-a-powerful-marketing-and-social-force/comment-page-1/#comment-1031</link>
		<dc:creator>Isman Tanuri</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 07:09:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://agroovyweb.com/?p=849#comment-1031</guid>
		<description>Wow! Thanks, Anol. I totally appreciate (and I&#039;m sure others who read this too) the fleshing out of Don Norman&#039;s  concept on Emotion and Design. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Brand does matter a lot as you have pointed out. But I have a feeling, we are never in the mindset of brand-building internally because the outright benefits from doing that are not as visible as brand exposures to customers/prospects. But in the long run, a company&#039;s morale is affected by how employees perceive their organisation as in the market place. I&#039;m sure many will be eager to jump to a more &#039;sexy&#039; competitor.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Guilty as charged! I believe in the ethos of Android, openness in the pursuit of innovation and making lives better. Oh wait. iOS is a great system too for it&#039;s usability and pleasing interface (you almost got me there.)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Cheers, man, thanks for the comment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow! Thanks, Anol. I totally appreciate (and I&#39;m sure others who read this too) the fleshing out of Don Norman&#39;s  concept on Emotion and Design. </p>
<p>Brand does matter a lot as you have pointed out. But I have a feeling, we are never in the mindset of brand-building internally because the outright benefits from doing that are not as visible as brand exposures to customers/prospects. But in the long run, a company&#39;s morale is affected by how employees perceive their organisation as in the market place. I&#39;m sure many will be eager to jump to a more &#39;sexy&#39; competitor.</p>
<p>Guilty as charged! I believe in the ethos of Android, openness in the pursuit of innovation and making lives better. Oh wait. iOS is a great system too for it&#39;s usability and pleasing interface (you almost got me there.)</p>
<p>Cheers, man, thanks for the comment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anol Bhattacharya</title>
		<link>http://agroovyweb.com/2010/07/27/cool-is-a-powerful-marketing-and-social-force/comment-page-1/#comment-1030</link>
		<dc:creator>Anol Bhattacharya</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 18:13:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://agroovyweb.com/?p=849#comment-1030</guid>
		<description>Hiya Isman Here goes an excerpt from the Book &quot;Emotional Design: Why We Love (or Hate) Everyday Things&quot; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://amzn.to/10reGj&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://amzn.to/10reGj&lt;/a&gt;) : &lt;a href=&quot;http://bit.ly/130S0N&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://bit.ly/130S0N&lt;/a&gt; . In a very short narration - Human reaction to design exists on three levels: visceral (appearance), behavioral (how the item performs) and reflective. The reflective dimension is what the product evokes in the user in terms of self-image or individual satisfaction.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It&#039;s not about behaving or acting cool, or even saying the product is cool. It&#039;s about the brand building mind-game where the consumer behaviour is influenced - eventually resulting into perception of being &#039;someone&#039; by product association.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Google android also stands for something - and you subconsciously associate yourself with it.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;RE YOG and Ris Low - (Sorry, can&#039;t pass the punning opportunity here). I think you can&#039;t even imagine going any more &#039;low&#039; on this subject. Only thing stands out in the video is her real &#039;low&#039; neckline!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hiya Isman Here goes an excerpt from the Book &#8220;Emotional Design: Why We Love (or Hate) Everyday Things&#8221; (<a href="http://amzn.to/10reGj" rel="nofollow">http://amzn.to/10reGj</a>) : <a href="http://bit.ly/130S0N" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/130S0N</a> . In a very short narration &#8211; Human reaction to design exists on three levels: visceral (appearance), behavioral (how the item performs) and reflective. The reflective dimension is what the product evokes in the user in terms of self-image or individual satisfaction.</p>
<p>It&#39;s not about behaving or acting cool, or even saying the product is cool. It&#39;s about the brand building mind-game where the consumer behaviour is influenced &#8211; eventually resulting into perception of being &#39;someone&#39; by product association.</p>
<p>Google android also stands for something &#8211; and you subconsciously associate yourself with it.</p>
<p>RE YOG and Ris Low &#8211; (Sorry, can&#39;t pass the punning opportunity here). I think you can&#39;t even imagine going any more &#39;low&#39; on this subject. Only thing stands out in the video is her real &#39;low&#39; neckline!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

