<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>a groovyweb &#187; monster.com.sg</title>
	<atom:link href="http://agroovyweb.com/tag/monster-com-sg/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://agroovyweb.com</link>
	<description>Social Conversations: The Art of Listening, Marketing 2.0 and Newish Technology &#38; Media</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Jun 2011 12:49:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Monster.com.sg: Online Brand Reputation is Important, No Guerilla Tactics, Please!</title>
		<link>http://agroovyweb.com/2009/10/17/monster-com-sg-online-brand-reputation-is-important-no-guerilla-tactics-please/</link>
		<comments>http://agroovyweb.com/2009/10/17/monster-com-sg-online-brand-reputation-is-important-no-guerilla-tactics-please/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Oct 2009 02:17:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Isman Tanuri</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marketing 2.0]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[brand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[branding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[email]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[monster.com.sg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reputation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[survey]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://groovygenie.wordpress.com/2009/10/17/monster-com-sg-online-brand-reputation-is-important-no-guerilla-tactics-please/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The importance of online branding is, without doubt, equally applicable for both businesses and individuals. With increased emphasis on branding through digital marketing efforts and social media engagement these days, the need for reputation management and preservation becomes critical. One wrong move or erratic online behavour may spell public relations disaster, brand damage or, worse, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The importance of online branding is, without doubt, equally applicable for both businesses and individuals. With increased emphasis on branding through digital marketing efforts and social media engagement these days, the need for reputation management and preservation becomes critical. One wrong move or erratic online behavour may spell public relations disaster, brand damage or, worse, the loss of customer/community trust (<a title="SocialMedia Today: Consumer Loyalty in New Economy" href="http://www.socialmediatoday.com/SMC/73930" target="_blank">trust creates loyalty</a>). The following is a case study on <a href="http://www.monster.com.sg/" target="_blank"><strong>Monster.com.sg</strong></a> (or perhaps an “authorised agent”) that highlights an online practice that is both unconventional and inappropriate on many counts.</p>
<p><span id="more-138"></span><br />
<em>Writer’s Note: This post is not intended as an exposé. I sincerely welcome Monster.com.sg to provide their point-of-view and comments on this page or to engage me in private (email me at isman.tanuri at gmail.com). I am highlighting this as an opportunity for all of us to learn, understand and navigate the digital web better. Additional info: Monster.com.sg is a global recruitment portal which I personally use and subscribed to.</em></p>
<p><em> </em></p>
<p><strong><span style="font-size:medium;">The Monster.com.sg Story</span></strong></p>
<p>The other day, I received an innocuous looking email from <a href="mailto:‘netsurveysingapore@yahoo.com’">‘<strong>netsurveysingapore@yahoo.com</strong>’</a> (displaying all of it below).</p>
<p><a href="http://groovygenie.files.wordpress.com/2009/10/image16.png" rel="lightbox[138]"><img style="display:inline;" title="image" src="http://groovygenie.files.wordpress.com/2009/10/image_thumb14.png" alt="image" width="661" height="224" /></a></p>
<p>It was titled ‘<strong>You’ve Received a Zoomerang</strong>’. Spammy-sounding? Very much so. A quick Google search shows that <a title="Zoomerang" href="http://www.zoomerang.com/" target="_blank">Zoomerang</a> is legitimate. Wondering what this is about, I clicked on the email. A somewhat abrupt and direct message greeted me, asking for my participation to ‘this survey’. ‘What survey?’, I asked. A Google query on ‘<em>netsurveysingapore</em>’ turned up <a href="http://www.google.com.sg/search?hl=en&amp;safe=off&amp;rlz=1C1CHMB_enSG334SG335&amp;q=netsurveysingapore&amp;btnG=Search&amp;meta=&amp;aq=f&amp;oq=" target="_blank">nothing</a>. Now, let us analyse this interaction so far.</p>
<p><strong><span style="font-size:small;">The Importance of Email Etiquette</span></strong></p>
<p>1. <strong>No ‘Hello’ or ‘Hi’</strong>: A simple polite greeting would have suffice to rein in my attention, even for a moment more. Your audience, this audience, is a breathing, emotional being.</p>
<p>2. <strong>Personalisation: </strong>Since I had turned up in the contact database, I am surprised at the failure to address me personally.  Compare the above email to the one I received from Paypal below. Paypal knows me and is not afraid to flaunt it.</p>
<p><a href="http://groovygenie.files.wordpress.com/2009/10/paypal1.jpg" rel="lightbox[138]"><img style="display:inline;" title="Paypal" src="http://groovygenie.files.wordpress.com/2009/10/paypal_thumb1.jpg" alt="Paypal" width="653" height="386" /></a></p>
<p>3. <strong>Lack of Contact Info: </strong>No additional return contact other than the ‘dubious’ Yahoo! email address was included. Till now, I do not comprehend the need for the ninja-like secrecy and being almost-anonymous. It pays to brand yourself a little more in emails, your intention becomes much clearer to the reader.</p>
<p>4. ‘<strong>No future communication necessary?’: </strong>‘<em>Thank you in advance’</em> is a hit-and-run strategy. A one-time effort to minimise interaction or simply being lazy? A disinterested intern? I can’t figure it out. So, what value can I, <em><strong>as</strong> <strong>a customer</strong></em>, give you, <em><strong>the business</strong></em>, if you do not care to prolong or maintain the relationship? It is not a good way forward if the customer laments of being exploited and used.</p>
<p><strong><span style="font-size:small;">Surprise, Surprise!</span></strong></p>
<p>So I took the plunge (in the name of research and adventure!) and clicked on the Zoomerang <a title="Try it, is is safe!" href="http://www.zoomerang.com/Survey/survey.zgi?p=U2DB7NFSEZ9K" target="_blank">link</a> (still up at time of writing). Lo and behold! It is <strong>Monster SG</strong>! Complete with corporate logo and tagline.</p>
<p><a href="http://groovygenie.files.wordpress.com/2009/10/image71.png" rel="lightbox[138]"><img style="display:inline;" title="image" src="http://groovygenie.files.wordpress.com/2009/10/image7_thumb1.png" alt="image" width="428" height="431" /></a></p>
<p>Now, this confuses me to no end. An almost anonymous email asking for my participation in a Monster.com.sg survey? This is their corporate communication practice? I still would like to give Monster.com.sg the benefits of my doubt. Maybe it is a less-than-savvy 3rd party service provider? Or a lack of financial resources for a proper campaign?</p>
<p>But inadvertently, the damage is done.</p>
<p>I am unsure how I can trust a brand, who has my personal details and permission to communicate with me, to approach me in such a manner. In my mind, this single activity has cheapened and degenerate the Monster.com brand value. Why? Because consumers tend to compare and others have done it better! Consider these:</p>
<p><a href="http://groovygenie.files.wordpress.com/2009/10/image17.png" rel="lightbox[138]"><img style="display:inline;" title="image" src="http://groovygenie.files.wordpress.com/2009/10/image_thumb15.png" alt="image" width="302" height="194" /></a> <a href="http://groovygenie.files.wordpress.com/2009/10/image18.png" rel="lightbox[138]"><img style="display:inline;" title="image" src="http://groovygenie.files.wordpress.com/2009/10/image_thumb16.png" alt="image" width="274" height="191" /></a> <a href="http://groovygenie.files.wordpress.com/2009/10/image19.png" rel="lightbox[138]"><img style="display:inline;" title="image" src="http://groovygenie.files.wordpress.com/2009/10/image_thumb17.png" alt="image" width="270" height="189" /></a></p>
<p>To your credit, you’ve done well too, but why not this time?</p>
<p><a href="http://groovygenie.files.wordpress.com/2009/10/image20.png" rel="lightbox[138]"><img style="display:inline;" title="image" src="http://groovygenie.files.wordpress.com/2009/10/image_thumb18.png" alt="image" width="299" height="208" /></a></p>
<p>In the age of social media, reputation management is a 24-7/365 effort I should say, for both business and personal brands.</p>
<p><strong>There’s more!</strong></p>
<p>This baffles me further….</p>
<p><a href="http://groovygenie.files.wordpress.com/2009/10/image121.png" rel="lightbox[138]"><img style="display:inline;" title="image" src="http://groovygenie.files.wordpress.com/2009/10/image121_thumb.png" alt="image" width="426" height="514" /></a></p>
<p>Wow! It is a ‘<em>what do you think of our competitors and us’</em> kind-of-survey. Gee. Based on this email activity, you have just shot yourself in the foot. The reader has lost all objectivity! Better luck next time, Monster!</p>
<p>As much as I applaud Monster.com.sg for their efforts in getting in touch with their subscribers to understand the marketplace better, this ‘guerilla tactic’ left a bad taste in my mouth. The web is about being open and transparent with your intentions, just as it is in a business meeting or a retail storefront.</p>
<p>Customers are a lot smarter these days in sussing out discrepancies and voicing their opinions. Take the <a href="http://www.todayonline.com/Voices/EDC091012-0000206/Online-Only---You-mean-bloggers-cant-speak-their-minds?" target="_blank">Obolo Cakeshop episode</a>. The <a href="http://myfoodsirens.wordpress.com/2009/10/14/you-mean-bloggers-cant-speak-their-minds/" target="_blank">backlash from online citizens</a> generated tremendous amount of <a href="http://www.makansutra.com/forums/singapore/viewtopic.php?f=4&amp;t=17 227&amp;p=270004" target="_blank">bad publicity</a> and brand damage for Obolo Cakeshop, that on hindsight, it would have been much better to engage in a more honest and reconciliatory manner.</p>
<p>I welcome anyone to share their similar experiences with brands below for our learning benefits and understanding the pitfalls of lax brand reputation management.</p>
<p><strong>Reputation Management – </strong></p>
<p><strong>Further Reading</strong></p>
<p>1 &#8211; Dell is one brand that has recovered from its ‘<a title="Dell Hell on Businessweek" href="http://www.businessweek.com/bwdaily/dnflash/content/oct2007/db20071017_277576.htm?chan=top+news_top+news+index_top+story" target="_blank">Dell Hell</a>’ disaster with its reputation intact. Dell embraced and leveraged on social media to repair its relations with customers and is now No. 1 in social media engagement among the world’s top technology brands in <a title="The World's Most Valuable Brand. Who's Most Engaged?" href="http://www.engagementdb.com/downloads/ENGAGEMENTdb_Report_2009.pdf" target="_blank">this study</a> .</p>
<p>2 &#8211; <a title="The Web Strategist" href="http://www.web-strategist.com/blog/" target="_blank">Jeremiah Owyang</a> (the ex-Forrester analyst with an equally-valuable personal brand) wrote on ‘<a title="A Chronology of Brands that Got Punk’d by Social Media" href="http://www.web-strategist.com/blog/2008/05/02/a-chonology-of-brands-that-got-punkd-by-social-media/" target="_blank">brands that stumbled in social media</a>’.</p>
<p>3 – Individuals are also seeing their personal reputation challenged openly. Read <a href="http://www.siliconbeachtraining.co.uk/blog/twitter-heckled-know-your-audience/" target="_blank">the story</a> on how a keynote speaker was Twitter-heckled in REAL TIME.</p>
<p><strong>Reputation Management Tools</strong></p>
<p>Click on to learn more on how to use these tools will help to manage your online reputation:</p>
<p>1 – <a href="http://www.google.com/alerts" target="_blank">Google Alerts</a></p>
<p>2 – <a href="http://search.twitter.com/" target="_blank">Search Twitter</a></p>
<p>3 – <a href="http://addictomatic.com/" target="_blank">Addictomatic</a></p>
<p>(Updated: 20/10/2009)</p>
<p><strong>Online Brand Monitoring Services</strong></p>
<p>1 &#8211; <a href="http://www.brandtology.com/" target="_blank">Brandtology</a></p>
<p>2 &#8211; <a href="http://jamiq.com/" target="_blank">JamiQ</a></p>
<p>3 &#8211; <a href="http://www.radian6.com/" target="_blank">Radian6</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://agroovyweb.com/2009/10/17/monster-com-sg-online-brand-reputation-is-important-no-guerilla-tactics-please/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

